You didn’t think I’d just hand you guys a full-body shot of a common insect family, did you? Of course not. I am far too clever. The mystery insect, believe it or not, is not a mutillid. Instead, it’s this thing:
Points are awarded as follows: 2 each to Piotr Naskrecki & Guillaume D for a virtual tie for order, and 8 to “µ” for the correct genus and family. One complicating factor is that this animal is variously placed in Bradynobaenidae or Chyphotidae (see discussion here). Thus, I’m also awarding 4 points to George Waldren for being the first to mention Chyphotidae.
Why isn’t this animal a velvet ant (Mutillidae)? The obvious character is that the prothorax is separate and freely articulated from the remainder of the tagma. In mutillids, the thorax is fused into a single unmoving shield. In less technical terms, our Chyphotes isn’t a velvet ant because she’s got a strong crease in the middle body segment.
Recent genetic data (Debevec et al 2012) suggest that similarities between the two wingless wasps may just be convergence:
Paraphyly or no, we have arrived at the end of the month. Our monthly winner is Guillaume D., who accumulated 10 points over the course of the month to narrowly edge out Julio Chaúl’s 9 points. Congratulations, Guillaume, email me for your loot!
Debevec, A. H., Cardinal, S., Danforth, B. N. (2012). Identifying the sister group to the bees: a molecular phylogeny of aculeata with an emphasis on the superfamily Apoidea. Zoologica Scripta 41: 527-535.