Mycocepurus smithi, in the fungus garden

An exciting week for ant aficionados! A new study by ant phylogenetics gurus Ted Schultz and Seán Brady provides the first detailed picture of attine evolution. These New World ants have long attracted the attention of biologists because they, like our own species, practice a well-developed form of agriculture. Instead of plants, these ants grow fungi, and their relationship is so specialized that the ants can consume nothing else. Schultz and Brady use data from four nuclear genes, the fossil record, and the biology of extant ants to infer an evolutionary history for 65 attine species. I’ve distilled their results (with the help of Mesquite) into a summary figure:


The basic picture is that the fungus-ant mutualism arose about 50 million years ago in a relatively generalized form. As we can see from the above tree, a great many attine lineages persist in this basic sort of system, allowing us to conclude with some confidence what the early attines were like. Species that practice this ‘lower’ agriculture (in Shultz and Brady’s words) have small colonies, often with no more than a few dozen ants, and they cultivate a wide range of different fungi in the Leucocoprineae. These fungi, as far as anyone can tell, are capable of a free-living existence when not hanging around in ant nests. The ants maintain their cultivars on a diet of vegetable debris and insect droppings.

‘Lower’ Agriculture: an inconspicuous entrance to a Mycetosoritis nest

‘Lower’ Agriculture: one meter underground, a golf-ball sized fungus garden of Mycetosoritis

‘Lower’ Agriculture: Mycetosoritis in the fungus garden

For the first 30 million years of ant agriculture, nothing all that significant happened. At least, not that we can tell from the available evidence. About 20 million years ago, spurred by who knows what, several interesting variations on the agricultural system appeared. A lineage of the graceful and leggy Apterostigma domesticated a completely unrelated coral fungus. A lineage of chunky little Cyphomyrmex started cultivating their fungus in yeast form. Perhaps most fatefully, one group of fungus lost its ability to live free of ant nests and started producing specialized food bodies for the ants’ consumption. This latter event spawned a series of “higher” agriculture systems.

The yeast garden of Cyphomyrmex rimosus on a substrate of caterpillar frass

‘Higher’ Agriculture: Trachymyrmex desertorum

‘Higher’ Agriculture: Sericomyrmex

The attines most familiar to us are the leafcutter ants of the tropics and subtropics. Their fungus has developed a taste for fresh wet vegetation, and the ants’ efforts to feed their ravenous cultivar are the stuff of legend. Mature Atta colonies contain millions of individuals and can defoliate entire trees overnight. Farmers despise them, naturalists sit and watch their busy trails for hours on end; they are dominant animals. They are also surprisingly recent. According to Schultz and Brady, the first leafcutters didn’t appear until about 10 million years ago, emerging from within the “higher” agriculture genus Trachymyrmex.

Leafcutter Agriculture: Acromyrmex coronatus

Leafcutter Agriculture: Atta cephalotes. The white substance
is the cultivated fungus, seen here digesting leaf matter.

Leafcutter Agriculture: external structure of a massive Atta nest

While all this is absolutely fascinating biology, the taxonomist in me cringes. The repeated pattern of specialized lineages evolving from within less specialized groups has created a taxonomist’s perfect storm. Each new innovation leaves behind a paraphyletic assemblage of species with the earlier, primitive traits. These earlier groups have none of the unique derived states required to establish a stable classification. As a consequence, the taxonomy of the attines will have to undergo a major upheaval.

In particular, don’t get too attached to the following paraphyletic genera: Trachymyrmex, Cyphomyrmex, Mycetosoritis, and Mycetophylax. Safe, for now, are Apterostigma, Mycetarotes, Mycocepurus, Myrmicocrypta, Acromyrmex, and Atta. I don’t envy whoever sits down to sort out the traditional taxonomic scheme along more evolutionary lines.

Source: Schultz, T.R., Brady, S.G. 2008. . PNAS Early Edition 10.1073/pnas.0711024105

More information:

Amazing video of a massive leafcutter nest
Leafcutter ant image gallery
Lurker’s guide to leafcutter ants
ScienceDaily coverage of the attine phylogeny